Source-backed claims
Product claims must come from WPlura product metadata, plugin source, docs, WordPress.org listings, or official vendor references.
Editorial Policy
How WPlura publishes public guidance
WPlura content is designed to be useful, source-backed, and clear about product boundaries. The policy keeps organic acquisition from becoming scaled, unsupported, or misleading content.
Policy
Editorial standards
No fabricated evidence
Research, comparisons, ratings, statistics, screenshots, and product capabilities must not be invented to fill a page.
People-first pages
Problem, guide, tool, research, integration, and comparison pages must answer the visitor's intent before suggesting a WPlura product.
Freshness controls
Published and reviewed dates should reflect meaningful editorial review, not routine deployments.
Corrections
When public guidance is wrong or stale, WPlura should correct the content and update the reviewed date only after review.
WordPress.org alignment
Messaging must avoid deceptive upsells, fake scarcity, hidden tracking, misleading security claims, and unsupported plugin distribution claims.